Friday, October 31, 2008

Zorro Decisions

In times of change, success depends, more than ever, on taking the right decisions that have the support of your team or family.
Because of the importance of such decisions, by nature we're not inclined to take any alternative or more risky solutions. Instead we go on 'Save' and base our decision on our passed experiences and our preferred and filtered ways of taking in information and making decisions.

As team or family member we all are selective in what we see or hear. More over, in changing times most of us avoid unnecessary conflict. Neither do we like extra challenge, as our bow cannot always be bent. We're captured in what is called our confirmation bias.

To prevent possible failures in decision making, it's important to include the different views and (decision) qualities of our team (family) members in a balanced way.

To help to make better and more considered decisions, we may use the so called Z-Technique, that Sue Nash uses in her action learning programs. This technique is based on the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).

To remember it better, Steve Roesler , related this technique, that he called 'Decision z', to the tv and movie character Zorro. So we might call it the 'Zorro Decision' technique.



The Zorro Decision technique is based on 4 steps:
  • Sensing
    Walk through and write down all possible facts and factual details.
  • Intuition
    Take a 'big picture' approach to think 'long term'.
    Write down all opportunities, possibilities, and connections between cause and effect.
  • Thinking
    Write down and discuss all possible solutions. Each with their pros and cons, risks, benefits, consequences and likelihood.
  • Feeling
    What impact does the decision have on other stakeholders or group members ( the 'people factor') How will you feel about the result? Will it gain support or meet opposition?



Remember Zorro next time you're about to take a group decision!

Sources: Sue Nash Consulting, Roesler Consulting Group


Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Manageable?

In order to succeed in a certain action, we often develop an action plan, a process that defines sub-actions in terms of who, what, when and where.

To guarantee that we succeed as much as possible, we have to maximize the control of this process of sub-actions. Make the process manageable.



In managing this process it's important to identify the nature and co-dependency of your sub-actions.

In general it's important to characterize sub-actions as follows:

Characteristic Understandable
Predictable Solvable
Simple ++ ++ ++
Complicated + + ++
Complex - - +
Chaotic -- -- -

Examples

Characteristic Example Description
Simple Doorbell
Single component/ process with defined output
Complicated Watch
Several components working together with defined output
Complex Weather
Many interdependent components with hardly predictable output.
Chaotic Clouds (form)
No sub components to identify, output unpredictable

Always analyze and characterize the components or sub actions of your action plan.
Not doing so will certainly cause trouble.

Example
One of the causes of the 2008 credit crisis is that we try to manage an in essential 'chaotic process' as a 'complicated process'. More traditional regulation rules (or governance back up) won't stabilize the banking system on the long run (in fact they make it worse), because these rules would imply that the nature of the financial markets is known and can be captured in a controllable mathematical linear system.

Financial markets are complex and chaotic systems, just like the weather. This implicates that regulation should be much more focused on "Plan B" measures than on detailed rule based regulation.

This means that regulation has to be formulated in such a way that Banks, instead of proving more and more that they will 'never' be insolvent (e.g. calculated risk=0,5%, that can't be calculated!), are forced to deliver Plan B's in which they state how they'll act in the 'unexpected' case of insolvency or iliquidity (average at least once in 200 years).

Just like you've got an umbrella in your car (Plan B), because you know that even though the weather forecast was 'sunny', you never can tell precisely when it's going to rain.

Most processes in life turn out to be chaotic on the long run. Analyze and control them, but don't forget to (always) carry your "Plan B" in your pocket.




Friday, October 10, 2008

Performance equation

What's result, what's performance, how can you manage it and does HR really help?

Difference between Result and Performance
Let's first distinguish between Result and Performance, simply stated:

Performance = Result / Potential

However, after setting the goals (i.e. the expected Results) the Potential (maximal Result that can be achieved) will almost certainly change due to all kind of changing external, non controllable or non influenceable, circumstances.

Performance related rewards and agreements should therefore always be made for different Potential-scenario's (bandwidth).

Board members, directors, employees, colleagues, friends, our kids, in short 'the contractor', should always be judged and rewarded on their actual performance and not on the results.
One of the main questions in this process is: Can the contractor control or influence the Potential?

Example
You committed to sell 100 books this year, being 0,1% of the national book market (Potential = 0,1% x 100.000 = 100)

PotentialResultPerformance
100100100%
5075150%
20015075%

From this it's clear that if national book sales (potential) would slink to 50%, selling 75 books results in a 150% performance. You would have done a great job, given the Circumstances!
The reverse, of course, is also true.

Performance: rule of thumb
On a personal level, Performance could - as rule of thumb - be defined as:

What you get done
=
[What you have]
x
[What you do with it]
x
[When, Where and How you do it]

Research done by John Purcell, Boxall and others, based on original marketing research of Jaworski(1989), show that successful firms have better people and better processes.

It seems that High Performing Organizations create success based on three pillars:
  • Human Capital Advantage (HCA)
  • Organization Process Advantage (OPA)
  • Organization Citizenship behaviour (OCB)

The AMO model
Professional people management is vital in creating these advantages.

Research and practise led to the development of the so called AMO Model.

P = f (A, M, O)

With P = Performance, A = Ability, M = Motivation and O = Opportunity.


Simply said,people perform well when:
  • they are able to do so
  • they have the motivation to do so
  • their (work) environment supports and stimulates them

Although the relationship (e.g. covariance, etc.) between the AMO elements (A, M,O) can be complex, it's clear that if one of them is zero, the Performance itself will also be zero. That's why the AMO equation is sometimes simplified as:

P = A x M x O

The performance equation
Another similar development by Douglas Peters led to "The Performance Equation":

P = At * ([ K + S ]/ ER)

Where P=performance, At=Attitude, K=Knowledge, S=Skills and ER= Environmental Roadblocks.
Peters sets Attitude in place of Motivation, combines Skills and Knowledge in Ability and defines ER as negative (opposite) aspect of Opportunity

Motivation revealed
Motivation is one of the most important drivers behind High performance.

Let's dig in to the several aspects of Motivation. Motivation has been analyzed by Victor Vroom. Vroom's Expectancy Theory (1964) is based upon the following three beliefs:
  • Valence
    The employee's defined (outcome) value of extrinsic rewards [money, promotion, time-off, benefits] or intrinsic rewards [satisfaction].
  • Expectancy
    The employee's confidence end expectation of what they are capable of doing.
  • Instrumentality
    The perception of employees whether they will actually get what they desire even if it has been promised by a manager.

Vroom states that these three aspects interact psychologically to create a motivational force such that the employee acts in ways that bring pleasure and avoid pain.

So according Vroom Motivation could be defined as:

M = E x I x V

Or in words, Motivation =
  • Expectancy: Perceived Probability of Success x
  • Instrumentality: Connection of Success and Reward x
  • Valence: Value of Obtaining Goal

Opportunity
Opportunity can be seen as everything in the environment that is necessary, supports, helps or sometimes blocks (negative opportunity) the performance of the contractor.
Charlie Cook defines Opportunities as Resources.

In fact Opportunities could be defined as:

O = R x H x C

With O = Opportunity, R = Resources, H = Help or support, C = Circumstances

Just to demonstrate: If you planned a BBQ and got enough meat (R) and matches (H), but it's raining cats and dogs (C), it's not what you would call a big opportunity.

Wrapping up
Wrapping up all Insights, Performance could be defined as:

P = A x M x O = S . K . E . I . V . R . H . C

With: S=Skills, K=Knowledge, E=Expectancy,I=Instrumentality, V=Valence, R=Resources, H=Help or support and C=Circumstances



Remember Performance is everywhere, not only in business.
Success in performing!



Thursday, October 9, 2008

The Collapse of Chaos in your life


Perhaps you think that if you have a consistent life-philosophy, your control your life and no great changes will take place?
Well,




you're probably wrong !

Even if we act in a stable consistent way, we keep interfering with our environment and our environment responses to us.

At first this response seems meaningless and of no value. You think you're consequent and your work and achievements in life seem relatively stable, perhaps a little bit chaotic and of no great significance. But in repeating the right things endlessly





Something will change

This change often will not appear as an evolution in your life, but as a kind of revolution, suddenly and most often unexpected.
Fore example, when you study, you'll probably once in a while think: what progress am I making?

But don't worry, if you keep on your track, there'll be a day your future suddenly comes to you (out of the blue: as a kind of emergent property) instead of "the you trying to make your future" in this Game of Life.





The solution : Langton's ant !


A good demonstration of this principle is









Langton's ant

Langton's ant is an virtual ant that starts out on a grid containing black and white cells, and then follows the following set of rules.
  1. If the ant is on a black square, it turns right 90° and moves forward one unit.
  2. If the ant is on a white square, it turns left 90° and moves forward one unit.
  3. When the ant leaves a square, it inverts the color.






The result is a quite complicated and apparently chaotic, but relatively stable, motion. But after about 10.000 moves the ant starts to build a broad diagonal "highway".






So keep on your track and wait for



The collapse of chaos in your life



Thursday, October 2, 2008

Trust or distrust?

Without trust you can't live. It's "the" basic element in politics, business, management, friendship, love and life.









Now, trust is not an easy subject.

For example:
  • Research showed that women and men both lie about three times every 15 minutes in a simple conversation.
  • The average credibility of a CEO in western countries is below 30%.
  • Only just 40% finds it (very) easy to trust an accountant.
So you could ask yourself,






What is Trust?


There can be no trust unless you give it first.
And even with someone you fully trust, you'll have to cope with distrust.
If you think you won't.. Just the fact you consciously decided to trust someone, means that you implicitly considered the theoretical possibility that he or she could betray your trust. So distrust was on your table. Not considering distrust is naive or even risky and will in most cases end in a disappointment.

Let's look at some properties of these trust relationships:

Trust relationships:
  • are bipolar : Trust and Distrust
  • include ambivalence: Degrees of [dis]trust, Simultaneous trust and distrust
  • are multifaceted: We can both trust and distrust the same person in different contexts

Trust relationships are also two dimensional:




Let's look at how you can manage trust and distrust in the same relationship.




From this matrix we may conclude the next rules of thumb:
  • 'Just' managing distrust, won't bring more trust.
  • If there is not enough trust, trying to manage distrust will escalate and lead to apathy and frustration. Once you're in this position, your relationship gets 'locked' and the both of you won't be able to manage your trust anymore.
  • Always start managing trust first.
    In a situation with "low distrust" by giving 'more freedom', 'stimulating each other' and 'creating happy moments'.
    In a situation with "high distrust" first by 'creating rules' and 'agreements' and (re)gain confidence in each other.

That's not all folks! It's just the start. Trust me.



Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Green & Clean

One of the most impressive stories that illustrate the principles of management and delegation is given by Stephen Covey in his fantastic book called The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People .

In this story called Green and Clean he illustrates four general principles that are important when you divide tasks. Wetter this is in your family or at your job. Wetter you're the boss or the employee. These principles lead to success!






Green & Clean
We were having a family meeting to divide the tasks in our family. My seven-year-old son, Stephen, volunteered to take care of the yard.
Before I actually gave him a job, I took him next door to our neighbor's. "Look, son," I said. "See how our neighbor's yard is green and clean? That's what we're after: green and clean.
Set Target

Set simple targets in a few words that everyone understand. No difficult or pagewide target definitions.
"Now before you decide whether or not you're going to take the job, let me tell you a few more things. Because when you take the job, I don't do it anymore. It's your job. I trust you to do the job, to get it done. Now who's going to be your boss?"
"You, Dad?"
"No, not me. You're the boss."
Define responsibility

Delegate and clearly define the responsibility and mandate at the right level.
Cut of dependent behavior.
"Now, guess who your helper is."
"Who?"

"I am," I said.
"You boss me."
"You tell me how I can help."
"I'll do anything you want me to do."
Offer help

Only after the target is set and the responsibility is defined: start helping
Don't start helping in an earlier state. Otherwise things will end up in a mess.
Two weeks went and nothing happened. The yard was going down the drain.
As I rounded the corner, I saw my son at the park across the street playing.
I faked a smile and yelled across the street, "How's the yard coming?" Then we walked around the yard together. His chin began to quiver and tears welled up in his eyes.
Accept failure

Delegating is a process. Accept that you don't succeed at once. Keep patience. Stand up as many times as necessary.
Than he finally asked for help.
I helped him two or three more times that entire summer.
After that, he himself took care of that yard . He kept it greener and cleaner than it had ever been.
Success

Final Acceptance and taking responsibility.
Using the above principles finally leads to the success you both wanted.


Covey is no narrow-minded or soft management-guru. On his website he states:



Human beings are not things needing to be motivated and controlled

They are four dimensional
body, mind, heart, and spirit


Dr. Stephen R. Covey
The 8th Habit
From Effectiveness to Greatness




As you see, the principles are all based on constructive communication.

Apply these simple principles everywhere and things will become a lot simpler in life.



Sunday, September 28, 2008

Everything under control?

Why is it we always have to control things?
Of course you need a certain amount of control to achieve your goals.
But too much control limits your creativity and output.

This is perfectly demonstrated by a quote of the famous Formula 1 driver Mario Andretti

If everything seems under control,
you're just not going fast enough !


Meeting you was fate, becoming your friend was a choice, but falling in love with you I had no control over !


So one of the secrets in life is to determine the right amount of control.

Control plays an important role in our life, as is demonstrated in the next quotes


Control Quotes

  • Meeting you was fate, becoming your friend was a choice, but falling in love with you I had no control over

  • You cannot control what happens to you, but you can control your attitude toward what happens to you

  • If you don't control your mind, someone else will

  • Self-disciplined begins with the mastery of your thoughts. If you don't control what you think, you can't control what you do

  • The secret of success is learning how to use pain and pleasure instead of having pain and pleasure use you. If you do that, you're in control of your life. If you don't, life controls you.

  • No one is in control of your happiness but you; therefore, you have the power to change anything about yourself or your life that you want to change




So, control your life but not too much !

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

We're all experts!

Ever heard of the Dunning Kruger Effect (DKE)?

DKE is simply said:

Novices overestimate their performance,
Experts underestimate their performance.




According to nobel prize winners Dunning & Kruger (1999), people tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities and performance.

This overestimation mainly occurs when people are unskilled (novices: +500% overestimation !).


Novices (unskilled) have a dual burden:
  • They reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices
  • Their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize this

This also explains why self-assessments often fail. In general people are thinking they're really doing a great job.

According to Krajč & Ortmann (2007), the bad judgements (metacognity inability) that leads to flawed self-assessments, could be better explained as 'unbiased judgements based on biased information'.

Highly skilled people, the experts, suffer from the opposite. They tend to underestimate (10%) their performance.



However it's been proved that feedback, training and making people conscious of DKE, reduces the effect.

Just look around, DKE is omni-present:
  • We're all sports experts (soccer, golf, darts)
  • We all know how to raise kids
  • Most employees have a 'common sense' opinion about marketing, branding, HR
  • We're all employee and family coaches
  • We all understand the risks of war, nuclear power, skiing

So teach and be aware of what you really know, develop (your skills) in what you would want to know, get help an get sight on what you'll never know, be open to feedback and don't forget to enjoy life in the meantime.